[vsnet-alert 10434] Re: OT_J040659.8+005244 superhump period

[Taichi Kato]

> We performed a PDM period analysis for the combined data (Aug. 8-10).
> The best estimated superhump period is 0.0799(2) d, though aliases
> are not completely excluded. The phase-averaged superhump profile
> shows a sign of a secondary hump.

   Other aliases seem to be excluded.  The best period based on the
data up to now is 0.07988(3) d.  There is some hint of period decrease
at dot(P)/P = -5*10^(-5).  Observations from different longitudes
are highly welcomed!