[vsnet-alert 12635] Re: WX Cet outburst?

[Rod Stubbings]

WX Cet did not have an outburst and was  <13.0 on this night, typing error.
The entry should have been WX Hyi  20110114.498   144 which was the next
observation under WX Cet. Sorry for the confusion.

Rod Stubbings.


_________________________________
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ohshima" <ohshima at kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
To: <suuma at yahoogroups.com>; <variable_star_forum at yahoogroups.com>;
<vsnet-alert at ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>; <vsnet-alert at yahoogroups.com>;
<vsnet-campaign-dn at ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>;
<vsnet-outburst at ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>;
<vsnet-outburst at yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 4:08 AM
Subject: [vsnet-alert 12632] WX Cet outburst?


> WX Cet outburst?
>
> According to R. Stubbings, the rare SU UMa type dwarf nova WX Cet
> underwent an outburst.
> The observed magnitude is vere faint for WX Cet. Additionally
> the negative data has been reported the next day by the same
> observer. Since there is a blank of seven days before this outburst,
> this may be the last stage of a normal outburst. Please inform ML
> if you observed this object between 7th and 14th of Jan.
>
>
>
>  20101230.478  <159  (Rod Stubbings)
>  20101231.489  <158  (Rod Stubbings)
>  20110101.603  <148  (Rod Stubbings)
>  20110102.476  <150  (Rod Stubbings)
>  20110106.410  <147c  (Kenji Hirosawa)
>  20110106.826  <160C  (Ian Miller)
>  20110107.489  <150  (Rod Stubbings)
>  20110114.498   144  (Rod Stubbings)
>  20110115.485  <150  (Rod Stubbings)
>