[vsnet-alert 14381] Re: Fwd: Re: BC UMa in outburst(?)

[FIDRICH Robert (Fidusz)]

Someone has already wrote on 23th March BC UMa was fainter than 180.
Probably a falsh alarm.

Clear skies,

Fidusz (FID/FRF)

> I couldn't confirm outburst of BC UMa.
> already declined?
> UMABC 20120326.520<160c Mdy
> (12/03/24 6:40), Patrick Schmeer wrote:
>>  Visual magnitude estimates by P. Schmeer, Bischmisheim, Germany:
>>  UMABC 20120323.878 140 Scp
>>  Sequence: AAVSO (V magnitudes)
>>  Instrument: 203-mm SCT
>>  Can anyone confirm this outburst?