[vsnet-alert 14503] ER UMa: the superhump period changed?
Ohshima
ohshima at kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Sun Apr 29 00:28:15 JST 2012
ER UMa: the superhump period changed?
We have received further observations from Akazawa-
san. According to these data, the superhumps period
seems not to be stable, longer than usual (~ 0.07 d).
Perhaps this is due to the superposion of negative
and positive superhumps. At any rate, in such stage,
the blank will affect the investigation of development
of superhumps. Further observations are encouraged!
More information about the vsnet-alert
mailing list