[vsnet-alert 14672] Re: PNV J17320840-4357306: is it real?

[Sebastián Otero]

My guess is that it is 10.3 instead of 01.3. What's the point in adding a 
leading zero to the magnitude?
And could an unfiltered CCD measure reach 1.3 mag. without saturation?---

Cheers,
Sebastian

-------------------------
Sebastian Otero
VSX Team
American Association of Variable Star Observers


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Alexandre Amorim" <costeira1 at yahoo.com>
To: <suuma at yahoogroups.com>; <variable_star_forum at yahoogroups.com>; 
<vsnet-alert at ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>; <vsnet-alert at yahoogroups.com>; 
<vsnet-campaign-dn at ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>; 
<vsnet-newvar at ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>; 
<vsnet-newvar at yahoogroups.com>; 
<vsnet-outburst at ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>; 
<vsnet-outburst at yahoogroups.com>; "Ohshima" <ohshima at kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 3:38 PM
Subject: [vsnet-alert 14670] PNV J17320840-4357306: is it real?



http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/followups/J17320840-4357306.html

PNV J17320840-4357306   2012 06 13.6380*  17 32 08.40 -43 57 30.6

mag:  01.3 U   (??)          Sco       N 0


********* Alexandre Amorim ***********
*        Estacao  Costeira1          *
*         Florianopolis/SC           *
*          http://go.to/c1           *
**************************************