[vsnet-grb-info 2333] GRB 051022: XRT Refined Spectral and Temporal
Analysis--Correction
GCN Circulars
gcncirc at capella.gsfc.nasa.gov
Fri Oct 28 10:22:05 JST 2005
TITLE: GCN GRB OBSERVATION REPORT
NUMBER: 4170
SUBJECT: GRB 051022: XRT Refined Spectral and Temporal Analysis--Correction
DATE: 05/10/28 01:19:53 GMT
FROM: George Ricker at MIT <grr at space.mit.edu>
GRB 051022: XRT Refined Spectral and Temporal Analysis--Correction
N. R. Butler (UC-Berkeley), G. R. Ricker (MIT), D. Q. Lamb(U.
Chicago), D. N. Burrows (PSU), J. Racusin (PSU), and N. Gehrels
(GSFC) report:
In our calculation (Butler et al. GCN 4165) of the extinction of the
optical and NIR afterglow of GRB 051022 in the observer frame implied
by the best-fit value of the absorption of the X-ray afterglow
measured by the Swift XRT, we did not take into account the
transformation between the absorption of the X-ray spectrum as
measured in the observer frame and that measured in the rest frame of
the host galaxy. Taking this transformation into account, and using
the same method as that described in Butler et al. (GCN 4165), we
derive the following values for the extinction in magnitudes in the
observer frame: A_V = 41.1 +/- 3.4, A_R = 36.7 +/- 3.0, A_I = 30.9
+/- 2.5, A_J = 17.6 +/- 1.5, A_H = 10.8 +/- 0.9, and A_Ks = 6.8 +/-
0.6.
These values for the extinction are large enough to account for the
failure to detect the afterglow of GRB 051022 in either the optical
(Torii GCN 4130; Schaefer GCN 4132; Sonoda et al., GCN 4133; Cenko et
al., GCN 4134; Cool GCN 4149; Immler et al., GCN 4155) or the NIR
(Castro-Tirado et al., GCN 4143; Berger and Wyatt, GCN 4148:
Nysewander et al., GCN 4152; Bloom GCN 4153), provided that most of
the dust is not destroyed by the burst and/or its afterglow.
More information about the vsnet-grb-info
mailing list