[vsnet-newvar 7227] Re: ATO J061.1478-31.0634 = Gaia19fes: orbital period

[Taichi Kato]

> Should we take 0.122641(4) d as the orbital period?
> And has the UGSU classification been confirmed?

   This one is SS Cyg star and the above period
refers to the orbital one.  No evidence of
superhumps during the outburst.

   The object is already in quiescence and no
further observations are particularly needed
(unless it undergoes another outburst).