[vsnet-outburst 14268] Re: V1454 Cyg outburst

[Taichi Kato]

> I must be missing something; I looked through arXiv:1111.4286 and saw no 
> reference to V1454 Cyg.  However, Bruce Sumner strongly suggested a counterpart 
> in 2000, based on my images:

   I confused with V1449 Cyg.  The SDSS field of V1454 Cyg was
poorly calibrated (in astrometry) and I didn't use it.

   Ian Miller reported further observations, and the mean superhump
period is 0.06098(4) d.