[vsnet-outburst 24551] Re: ASASSN-19ado: ordinary superhumps

[Keisuke Isogai]

     By using Itoh-san, Tamas Tordai and Geoff Stone's data,
I obtained the updated period of 0.0652(5) d for ordinary
superhump. The O-C diagram also support this result. On
the other hand, the updated early superhump period is
0.06309(3) d. (Thanks to many observations, there is no
strong alias.) These periods are consistent with each other.

On 2020/01/14 13:44, Taichi Kato wrote:
> Re: ASASSN-19ado: ordinary superhumps
>
>> I find a superhump period of 0.0690 +/- 0.0012d.
>     The value for early superhumps by Isogai-san
> (vsnet-alert 23826) appears to be inconsistent with
> this period.  My value in vsnet-alert 23823 appears
> to be more consistent.  We used the same data,
> but my impression is that Isogai-san's analysis
> suffered from inclusion of lower-quality data.
>