[vsnet-outburst 6636] (fwd) New dwarf nova near M27, chart information (Renz)

Taichi Kato tkato at kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Mon Aug 29 09:04:30 JST 2005


   Information from W. Renz:

Subject: Charts and Sequence for New Object near M27 (VAR Vul 05)
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 22:53:15 +0200

Hello

First a summary what is known about the variable up to now:
Tonny Vanmuster and Brian Martin detected humps of 0.3 mag
with an period of about 82 min that are typical for dwarf novae
(UG Gem stars) of type SU UMa (UGSU stars). If it shows a
steep drop in the mag values within the next days, its an clue
that its a 'normal' UGSU star. These have super outburst cycles
of about 100 to 1000 days and normal outburst that are shorter
and about 1 mag fainter than super outbursts.
But the amplitude of about 10 mag is pretty large for a 'normal'
UGSU star. So it would be a TOAD (tremendous outburst
amplitude dwarf nova). As the outburst amplitude of dwarf novae
get larger with longer outburst cycles, it might be one of the rare
UGSU star of subtype WZ Sge (UGSU/WZ). These have super
outburst cycles of more than 1000 and up to a few 10000 days
and show no normal outbursts like the other UGSU stars.=20
As some recurrent novae behave similar to UGSU/WZ stars
(actually most UGSU/WZ stars were first classified as recurrent
novae before their true nature was discovered), there is still a
possibility that its one of these. The outburst amplitude of about
10 mag alone would still allow an interpretation as a slower nova.
In the end just further observations and a spectrum can prove if
its a dwarf nova (with a bright blue continuum due to a heated
disk that transforms potential energy into radiation) or a
classical/recurrent nova (with a nuclear run-away that blows the
outer part of the collected  hydrogen hull into space).


What can we amateurs do (execpt of waiting for the
professionals to make a spectrum) ?
- Monitor the variable with our CCDs for the next three month
  (UGSU/WZ stars show rebrightenings, so it might not be all
  over after you made your first negative CCD observation)
- Check our recently made images of M27 to isolate the date/
  time of the current outburst (should have been between Aug
  11 and Aug 14) and an accurate maximum brightness.
- Check our older film and CCD images for previous outbursts
  (if its a UGSU star or a recurrent nova it must have shown
  earlier outburst). If you own older books or magazines with
  images of M27, check them too. If you have access to a plate
  archive like Harvard or Sonneberg and some time to spend,
  you might check their plates too.

I've created the VarVul05 Yahoo group at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/VarVul05/
to collecting data from 'pretty pictures'.
Any data of VAR Vul 05 that goes down to 15 mag and deeper
is of interest and will be forwarded to the AAVSO, cvnet and
vsnet.
Due to its vicinage to M27, this is the unique chance to collect
data of several decades for this new variable.
Please take part in this exciting scientific campaign.
Thanks for your efford in advance.


For every image I need the following data:
- Date & mid-time in UT, if the the image was made in a single
  night.
  Date range in UT, if images were made over several nights.
  Please, give the time if it is still (easily) available. The time is
  required if its near and in outburst. Use the data of the lumi-
  nance image(s) if you used a luminance channel.
- mag: Magnitude of VAR Vul 05 if detected.
- LM: Approximate limiting magnitude of image.
- T: Type of the photometric band of the magnitudes used for
  mag and LM (B, V, Rc or Ic)
- Image: Used filter channel(s)
  (e.g. C, L, R, G, B, Ha, OIII, SII, HaOIII, LRGB, CRGB, RGB, ...)=20
- Observer data: First name, last name, city, country
- If possible the used image itself or a link to the image.


You can access the official (15'x15') AAVSO chart of VAR Vul 05
(942 KB) at:
http://www.aavso.org/charts/VUL/VAR_VUL_05/
or a down sized version (175 KB) at:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/VarVul05/files/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/VarVul05/files/AAVSOchart_VARVUL05-F.jpg

I've placed two charts and the below sequence of the close
surrounding (2'x2') of VAR Vul 05 in the files section of the
VarVul05 Yahoo group:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/VarVul05/files/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/VarVul05/files/varvul05lm.seq
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/VarVul05/files/VarVul05lm-color.jpg
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/VarVul05/files/VarVul05lm-print.jpg


Using the this sequence everyone can easily detect the limiting
magnitude of an image down to 20 mag:

ID    RA (J2000) DEC       n  q    B     (B-V)    V     (V-R)c   Rc    =
(R-I)c   Ic    (V-I)c
A  299.975600  22.697012   7  +  15.298  0.837  14.461  0.508  13.953  =
0.516  13.437  1.024
B  299.945650  22.723832   8  +  16.114  0.907  15.207  0.530  14.677  =
0.542  14.135  1.072
C  299.976820  22.717449   7  +  17.076  1.037  16.039  0.649  15.390  =
0.647  14.743  1.296
D  299.976498  22.708397   7  +  17.040  0.942  16.098  0.548  15.550  =
0.514  15.036  1.062
E  299.953540  22.700717   7  +  18.282  1.645  16.637  0.960  15.677  =
0.910  14.767  1.870
F  299.952621  22.711413  10     17.918  1.234  16.684  0.762  15.922  =
0.741  15.181  1.503
G  299.973373  22.719585   8  +  18.544  1.278  17.266  0.803  16.463  =
0.759  15.704  1.562
H  299.966295  22.711495   8     18.998  1.342  17.656  0.844  16.812  =
0.799  16.013  1.643
I  299.964065  22.715243   7  +  19.537  1.673  17.864  1.014  16.850  =
0.963  15.887  1.977
J  299.970520  22.706022   8     19.196  1.300  17.896  0.762  17.134  =
0.728  16.406  1.490
K  299.962465  22.714542  11     19.508  1.504  18.004  0.749  17.255  =
0.844  16.411  1.593
L  299.960314  22.711854  11  -  19.573  1.366  18.207  0.349  17.858  =
0.656  17.202  1.005
M  299.968522  22.715432   7  +  20.108  1.572  18.536  0.895  17.641  =
0.909  16.732  1.804
N  299.965691  22.715633   9     20.356  1.626  18.730  1.110  17.620  =
0.936  16.684  2.046
O  299.962649  22.709794   9     20.074  1.329  18.745  0.356  18.389  =
0.779  17.610  1.135
P  299.980689  22.698751   8 (+) 19.119  0.046  19.073 -0.013  19.086  =
0.254  18.832  0.241
Q  299.967575  22.704426   8  +  20.513  1.322  19.191  1.092  18.099  =
0.824  17.275  1.916
R  299.963127  22.708488   9  -  20.624  1.246  19.378  0.181  19.197  =
0.962  18.235  1.143
S  299.965496  22.704913   7 (+) 21.407  2.020  19.387  1.147  18.240  =
1.243  16.997  2.390
T  299.969273  22.709816   5  -  21.046  1.552  19.494  0.513  18.981  =
0.830  18.151  1.343

Notes:
1. There is an AAVSO f scale chart dated 050823 (15'x15') for
   this variable. The only star in common is star D labeled 161 in
   the AAVSO chart.
2. Stars with smaller than average errors for their bightness are
   labeled '+' in column q. Stars with larger errors are labeled '-'
   (due to near companions or possible variability). The average
   V errors are < 0.03 mag at the bright end and <=3D 0.06 mag at
   the faint end. The bluest star P has small errors just in B, V and
   (B-V). The reddest star S has a larger error just in (B-V) and B.
3. Stars with good photometry were taken from m27good.dat.
   The other, mostly fainter stars were taken from m27.dat.
   ftp://ftp.nofs.navy.mil/pub/outgoing/aah/sequence/
4. The main aim of this sequence is not to give the best possible
   comp stars, but to determine the limiting magnitude near the
   variable. If you use this sequence for photometry, use the bluer
   + stars for the zero point (the varaible has a (V-Ic) of about 0.3
   mag).
5. The field is very reddened due to interstellar gallactic
   extinction. The comp stars B,   E and F lie within the first shell of
   M27. The comp stars A, C, D, G and P lie within the third shell.
   All others lie within or at the outer boarder of the second shell.
   There is just one star with good photometry in m27good.dat=20
   and 8 stars with acceptable photometry in m27.dat with a (B-V)
   < 0.5 mag. But none of them is in the range 14.2-18.2 magV or
   close to the variable.


- For blue sensitive film, B and Hbeta filtered images
  use the B mags.
- For green sensitive film, G, V and OIII filtered images
  use the V mags.
- For red sensitive film, R, Rc, Ha and SII filtered images
  use the Rc mags.
- For Ic and NIR filtered images
  use the Ic mags.
- For unfiltered, clear and luminance filtered images it depends
  on the used CCD chip.
  - If it has its max QE below 540 nm (e.g. Kodak KAI and Sony
    interline CCD chips)
    use the V mags.
  - It it has its max QE above 640 nm (e.g. most Kodak KAF non-
    E and TI full frame CCD chips)
    use the Rc mags.
  - The Kodak KAF blue-enhanced E chip images might be
    reduced using the V or Rc mags as the QE lies in between.
- For LRGB and CRGB images see clear and luminance filtered
  images above.
- For RGB images it depends on the composition. If the G image
  is deep enough, then use it with V mags.

If you are not sure what mags to use, take a look at the stars D
and E. If D appears obviously brighter than E, then use V mags.
If they appear about of equal brightness, then use Rc mags.
You can also take a look at stars P and Q. If they appear about
of equal brightness, then use V mags. If Q appears considerable
brighter than P, then use Rc mags.=20

Please feel free to forward this email and the charts to others that
might be interested.

Clear skies
  Wolfgang

--=20
Wolfgang Renz, Karlsruhe, Germany
Rz.BAV =3D WRe.vsnet =3D RWG.AAVSO



More information about the vsnet-outburst mailing list