[vsnet-alert 14503] ER UMa: the superhump period changed?

Ohshima ohshima at kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Sun Apr 29 00:28:15 JST 2012


ER UMa: the superhump period changed?

 We have received further observations from Akazawa-
san. According to these data, the superhumps period
seems not to be stable, longer than usual (~ 0.07 d).
Perhaps this is due to the superposion of negative 
and positive superhumps. At any rate, in such stage,
the blank will affect the investigation of development
of superhumps. Further observations are encouraged!


More information about the vsnet-alert mailing list