[vsnet-newvar 9161] Re: RomanovV48: object below the period minimum with a hot secondary?
31 Mar
2022
31 Mar
'22
7:48 a.m.
Re: RomanovV48: object below the period minimum with a hot secondary?
I have confirmed that a hot secondary cannot explain the observed magnitudes. This object indeed appears to be a polar.
764
Age (days ago)
764
Last active (days ago)
vsnet-newvar@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Taichi Kato