[vsnet-alert 13092] Re: DR UMa outburst!

[Taichi Kato]

Re: DR UMa outburst!

>       Although the object is listed as a candidate quasar in various
> papers, I see no redshift determination from a _spectrum_ in the
> VizieR listing, only inference from colors and photometric redshift,
> which is obviously wrong.

   This object (not at nominal catalog position of DR UMa) has been
detected in radio (GB6 J1359+5544, FIRST) which might prefer an AGN-related
origin.