Dear Taichi You wrote: (Dear Tonny, your messages were again under "ASASSN-22ho: new SU UMa-type dwarf nova"). That's very strange. Looking at the "To" field of my message, it mentions "'cba-chat(a)cbastro.org'stro.org'; 'Kenta TAGUCHI' <kentagch(a)kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>jp>; 'vsnet-alert(a)ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp'.jp'; 'Taichi Kato' <tkato(a)kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>jp>; 'vsnet-campaign-dn(a)ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp'.jp'; 'vsnet-newvar(a)yahoogroups.com'com'; 'vsnet-outburst' <vsnet-outburst(a)ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>" and the "Subject" field mentions "CSS 091019:220450+054852: updated superhump period". So, I see nowhere a reference to ASASSN-22ho in the email I sent out. I have no clue why you are seeing that reference. Can you send me the email you received (via private email), so that I can further analyse this issue? Kind regards Tonny -----Original Message----- From: Taichi Kato <tkato(a)kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp> Sent: Saturday, 3 December 2022 01:36 To: vsnet-alert(a)ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp; vsnet-campaign-dn(a)ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp; vsnet-newvar(a)ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp; vsnet-outburst(a)ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp Subject: [vsnet-alert 27161] CRTS J220449.8+054852 superhump period CRTS J220449.8+054852 superhump period Tonny Vanmunster and Itoh-san have reported observations. The superhump period from these observations was 0.0948(1) d, slightly shorter than reported in [vsnet-alert 27150]. Large superhump amplitude. (Dear Tonny, your messages were again under "ASASSN-22ho: new SU UMa-type dwarf nova").