Following VSOLJ bulletin are now available at
http://vsolj.cetus-net.org/bulletin.html
No.81 2021 Sep.
Orbital and spin periods of the candidate white dwarf pulsar
ASASSN-V J205543.90+240033.5
Taichi Kato, Franz-Josef Hambsch, Elena P. Pavlenko, Aleksei A. Sosnovskij
Seiichiro Kiyota, VSOLJ
ATO J061.1478-31.0634 (UG)
https://www.aavso.org/vsx/index.php?view=detail.top&oid=1499859
Couldn't this be an SU UMa-type dwarf nova with a long orbital period?
And couldn't the long outburst in 2019 November have been a long
normal one? (like those observed in e.g. V1006 Cyg and TU Men)
Regards,
Patrick
-------
Am Mittwoch, 22. Januar 2020, 00:10:52 MEZ hat Taichi Kato <tkato(a)kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp> Folgendes geschrieben:
> Should we take 0.122641(4) d as the orbital period?
> And has the UGSU classification been confirmed?
This one is SS Cyg star and the above period
refers to the orbital one. No evidence of
superhumps during the outburst.
The object is already in quiescence and no
further observations are particularly needed
(unless it undergoes another outburst).
PT Per: orbital period
From ZTF data. Porb=0.0562733(1) d.
Double humps per orbital cycle.
The period does not support a period bouncer suggested
by Watson et al. (2015).